Testimonies.

Three scientists—Papaia, Banani, Ravioli—and their assistant Igor, who are supposed to attend the famous dark matter conference, take the wrong flight and end up on the other side of the world. After arriving at the wrong airport, they book a hotel to spend the night, but it’s not exactly what they expected… in the sense that it’s awful.

We’re on the hotel stairs, where the four are making their way up, discussing the book Banani found on the plane.

Ravioli: Let me give you an example: imagine four people witness a robbery in a store.

Banani: Okay.

Ravioli: We have four witnesses, the robber, and the store clerk, right?

Banani: Yes.

Ravioli: After the robbery, the four witnesses are questioned. What do you think they will say?

Banani: They’ll all tell the same story, but in different words.

Ravioli: Not exactly. The testimonies will have three characteristics:

  1. The essential facts, like the robber entering and threatening the clerk with a gun.
  2. The secondary details, meaning specifics that some notice and others don’t, like the color of the robber’s shirt or the type of weapon he was holding.
  3. The apparent contradictions, which are small details that seem inconsistent between different accounts but are actually normal in authentic testimonies.

Banani: Just like in the Gospels!

Ravioli: Exactly! After analyzing these elements, the detective concluded that the Gospels are authentic and reliable testimonies.

Igor: “Like our review of this hotel!

  1. The essential facts: It sucks.

🤣🤣🤣

  1. The secondary details: Banani complains there’s no water, Ravioli protests there’s no food, and Papaia… well, he’s still trying to find the reception.

🤣🤣🤣

  1. The apparent contradictions: Banani says it’s a three-star hotel, Ravioli swears he saw half a star, and I’m convinced the only stars here are the ones we’ll see after sleeping on those beds!”

🤣🤣🤣