Certainties in Question

Three renowned scientists—Papaia, Banani, Ravioli—and their assistant Igor work at the NASAL observatory.
Ravioli accidentally bought a book, which turns out to be very interesting.

We are at the airport, where the scientists are discussing Ravioli’s book.

Papaia: Come on, guys! We’re in the twenty-first century. We can’t believe in such superstition. We’re scientists!

Banani: Yes! But then, one of these five facts must be false!

Ravioli: The issue here is that there is evidence, it’s not a matter of opinion.

Papaia: That’s true! As scientists, we must follow the evidence. And, in this case, it leads to the resurrection.

Banani: According to the laws of nature, resurrection from the dead, after three days, is impossible. Considering, moreover, that Jesus appeared perfectly healthy and healed from the wounds.

Ravioli: That’s true! Those guys died believing their leader had risen from the dead. If he had appeared in bad condition, they would never have believed him.

Banani: If the natural laws don’t fully explain reality, and the evidence points to a supernatural explanation, we can’t dismiss it a priori.

Papaia: Maybe all this mess at the airport happened for a good reason.

Igor: Yes… to teach Papaia that, just like tampered vending machines and ATMs, Ravioli, when he’s hungry, is suspicious and unreliable!

🤣🤣🤣