Three renowned scientists—Papaia, Banani, Ravioli—and their assistant Igor work at the NASAL observatory.
Papaia remembers that the flight for the conference is in two hours.
With their too many, open, and broken suitcases, they create chaos wherever they go.
In front of the observatory, the scientists are waiting for the taxi.
Papaia: It’s good to take advantage of this time for a double check. Did you get everything?
The other two nod absentmindedly and continue their conversation about the book.
Banani: Well, even if Jesus really existed and was crucified, that doesn’t prove that he rose from the dead. I don’t see how we can consider this fact as evidence of the resurrection.
Ravioli: You need to be patient, Banani. The five facts, taken individually, certainly don’t prove the resurrection. But the magic happens when we put all five together.
Banani: Yeah? And how’s that?
Ravioli: Once we establish that all five facts are historically certain, the most plausible explanation is the resurrection.
Banani: Ah, I get it, so I need to wait to hear all five. Yeah, but then what do I do with these five facts? How do they explain the resurrection?
Ravioli: Like I said, you have these facts that we are certain about. Now, you need to explain them somehow, right?
Banani: Yeah, that’s obvious, if we have these facts, there must be a reason.
Ravioli: And that’s the interesting part! In fact, if we exclude the resurrection and try to find a naturalistic explanation, we can’t find one!
Banani: Really? And how can that be?
Ravioli: We could answer in many ways, but the best explanation remains the resurrection.
Papaia (irritated): As far as I know, the resurrection is just a legend, invented by the church to take money from the simpletons who believe in it!
Igor: Speaking of relativity… After all the nonsense I’ve seen these doctors do, the definition of: simpleton, becomes a very… relative concept!
🤣🤣🤣